Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
From: Alan <not.me_at_rcn.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:32:54 -0500
Message-ID: <36mro7F510fc3U1_at_individual.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:32:54 -0500
Message-ID: <36mro7F510fc3U1_at_individual.net>
Therefore, I think this extension is a model
> that is separate and discernable one, not one that "redefines" and
> supercedes the original. If I understand you Dawn, this is the point you
> are making. Don't redefine 1NF, call Date's model something else.
>
> Everyone won't agree with this particular opinion of course. I can accept
> that.
>
> - Dan
Well, I certainly agree. I am relieved that there is someone who can provide a lucid explanation of the situtation. Received on Sun Feb 06 2005 - 16:32:54 CET