Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads

From: strider5 <strider5_at_szm.com>
Date: 8 Feb 2005 00:14:19 -0800
Message-ID: <1107850459.546667.286610_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

i can see it is equivalent, but you introduced a new attribute - key_name.
are those designs "totally equivalent" (your term)? S. Received on Tue Feb 08 2005 - 09:14:19 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: strider5: "Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads"
Previous message: lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com: "Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads"
In reply to: Paul: "Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads"
Next in thread: Alan: "Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message