Re: SQL Database design question

From: Erland Sommarskog <esquel_at_sommarskog.se>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 22:16:34 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Xns95F6EC826B9B1Yazorman_at_127.0.0.1>


David Cressey (david.cressey_at_earthlink.net) writes:
> "William Cleveland" <WCleveland_at_Ameritech.Net> wrote in message
> news:a3CNd.1986$ng6.448_at_newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
>

>> I'm afraid I don't have a good solution, except for the suggestion
>> I've made at work that both the DBA *and* the original database
>> designer sign off on changes in a database.  So far, no luck.

>
> The problem with this is the case when a database is part of a software
> package that is sold to multiple clients.
>
> The DBA typically works for a client, while the original database
> designer works for the vendor, or the people the vendor bought the
> rights from. I think this is not a trivial distinction.

Indeed. Being on the vendor side of the fence, I say that all warranties are waived if you meddle with the database by other means through our application.

-- 
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel_at_sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/productdoc/2000/books.asp
Received on Mon Feb 07 2005 - 23:16:34 CET

Original text of this message