comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: A Question on Integrety Mike Sherrill (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 08:36:14 CST)
Re: A Question on Integrety Roy Hann (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 03:23:43 CST)
- Re: A Question on Integrety Paul G. Brown (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 12:10:53 CST)
  - Re: A Question on Integrety Roy Hann (Sun Dec 21 2003 - 08:53:12 CST)
Re: A Question on Integrety Tony (Wed Dec 17 2003 - 05:29:38 CST)
Microsoft and the two great blunders Alfredo Novoa (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 06:34:33 CST)
- Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Marshall Spight (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 10:12:20 CST)
  - Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Alfredo Novoa (Sat Dec 20 2003 - 11:26:56 CST)
- Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Joe \ (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 11:43:54 CST)
- Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Costin Cozianu (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 12:04:24 CST)
  - Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Alfredo Novoa (Sat Dec 20 2003 - 11:41:16 CST)
    - Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Costin Cozianu (Sat Dec 20 2003 - 16:36:50 CST)
      - Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Alfredo Novoa (Tue Dec 23 2003 - 05:49:14 CST)
        
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Costin Cozianu (Tue Dec 23 2003 - 09:51:17 CST)
        
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Joe \ (Tue Dec 23 2003 - 18:17:58 CST)
        
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Costin Cozianu (Tue Dec 23 2003 - 21:03:56 CST)
        
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Alfredo Novoa (Wed Dec 24 2003 - 06:38:44 CST)
        
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Mikito Harakiri (Wed Dec 24 2003 - 11:13:08 CST)
        
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Costin Cozianu (Wed Dec 24 2003 - 18:40:08 CST)
        
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Alfredo Novoa (Thu Dec 25 2003 - 03:55:22 CST)
        
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Costin Cozianu (Fri Dec 26 2003 - 02:04:03 CST)
        
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Alfredo Novoa (Sun Dec 28 2003 - 14:00:37 CST)
        
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Costin Cozianu (Sun Dec 28 2003 - 15:58:25 CST)
        
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Alfredo Novoa (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 11:07:37 CST)
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Bob Badour (Sun Dec 28 2003 - 23:35:34 CST)
        
        Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Costin Cozianu (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 00:59:52 CST)
- Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders Christopher Browne (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 15:52:30 CST)
SQL Select statement 2 very similar versions. Thought they were both valid ANSI SQL but various SQL engines parse these out differently. Mike & Janet Larke (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 07:05:09 CST)
- Re: SQL Select statement 2 very similar versions. Thought they were both valid ANSI SQL but various SQL engines parse these out differently. Fredrik Ålund (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 07:53:35 CST)
ODBC: Is there something called text/csv database? Public Interest (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 09:43:25 CST)
- Re: Is there something called text/csv database? Joe \ (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 10:42:15 CST)
- Re: ODBC: Is there something called text/csv database? Ed prochak (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 13:25:40 CST)
- Re: ODBC: Is there something called text/csv database? Jay Tilton (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 20:26:15 CST)
  - Re: ODBC: Is there something called text/csv database? Social Liberal-Fiscal Conservative (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 21:15:26 CST)
    - Re: ODBC: Is there something called text/csv database? Jim Gibson (Mon Dec 22 2003 - 13:07:29 CST)
Relational Database Comparison Public Interest (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 09:47:27 CST)
- Re: Relational Database Comparison Jim Kennedy (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 09:53:25 CST)
- Re: Relational Database Comparison Ed prochak (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 13:36:26 CST)
- Re: Relational Database Comparison Christopher Browne (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 16:52:25 CST)
  - Re: Relational Database Comparison Paul (Sat Dec 20 2003 - 06:04:28 CST)
    - Re: Relational Database Comparison Serge Rielau (Tue Dec 30 2003 - 15:39:14 CST)
Oracle9i on Intel vs UltraSPARC Greg Angevine (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 11:48:37 CST)
How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information? Marshall Spight (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 13:42:24 CST)
- Re: How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information? Bob Badour (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 14:27:07 CST)
  - Re: How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information? Marshall Spight (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 16:11:00 CST)
    - Re: How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information? Bob Badour (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 16:51:42 CST)
      - Re: How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information? Marshall Spight (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 17:08:29 CST)
    - Re: How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information? Bob Badour (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 16:55:28 CST)
      - Re: How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information? Marshall Spight (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 17:05:15 CST)
- Re: How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information? --CELKO-- (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 17:59:24 CST)
- Re: How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information? abombss (Mon Dec 22 2003 - 14:07:30 CST)
relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 18:43:40 CST)
- Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 20:20:46 CST)
  - Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Sat Dec 20 2003 - 12:41:05 CST)
    - Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sat Dec 20 2003 - 15:30:28 CST)
    - Re: relations aren't types? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sat Dec 20 2003 - 22:48:46 CST)
      - Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Sun Dec 21 2003 - 15:01:04 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sun Dec 21 2003 - 18:54:14 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Mon Dec 22 2003 - 11:35:34 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Tue Dec 23 2003 - 00:01:35 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Alfredo Novoa (Tue Dec 23 2003 - 06:32:59 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Fri Dec 26 2003 - 11:23:42 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Joe \ (Fri Dec 26 2003 - 11:44:45 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Fri Dec 26 2003 - 12:21:40 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Joe \ (Fri Dec 26 2003 - 13:53:46 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Fri Dec 26 2003 - 14:56:41 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Joe \ (Fri Dec 26 2003 - 21:44:03 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Fri Dec 26 2003 - 21:49:01 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sat Dec 27 2003 - 00:28:38 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Fri Dec 26 2003 - 15:42:38 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sat Dec 27 2003 - 00:22:33 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Sat Dec 27 2003 - 01:46:18 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sat Dec 27 2003 - 16:51:50 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Sat Dec 27 2003 - 23:02:47 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sun Dec 28 2003 - 03:28:14 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Sun Dec 28 2003 - 18:43:52 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Joe \ (Sun Dec 28 2003 - 19:08:59 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sun Dec 28 2003 - 23:21:33 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 00:07:22 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 04:36:12 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 11:06:14 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Costin Cozianu (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 16:54:52 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Lauri Pietarinen (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 17:57:57 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 21:24:32 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Tue Dec 30 2003 - 00:53:37 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Jonathan Leffler (Tue Dec 30 2003 - 01:41:37 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Lauri Pietarinen (Wed Dec 31 2003 - 00:59:35 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? Alfredo Novoa (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 11:17:09 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 20:44:59 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Mikito Harakiri (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 21:31:32 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Tue Dec 30 2003 - 15:11:27 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Tue Dec 30 2003 - 00:24:48 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Mikito Harakiri (Tue Dec 30 2003 - 11:46:12 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Tue Dec 30 2003 - 12:59:33 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Vadim Tropashko (Tue Dec 30 2003 - 13:19:13 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Tue Dec 30 2003 - 15:17:00 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Tue Dec 30 2003 - 16:19:33 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Wed Dec 31 2003 - 00:52:51 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Wed Dec 31 2003 - 04:13:58 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Wed Dec 31 2003 - 13:23:07 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Wed Dec 31 2003 - 13:29:58 CST)