Re: The Theoretical Void in the relational Database Space - Normalisation

> On Thursday, 26 February 2015 03:58:59 UTC+11, Derek Asirvadem wrote:
> > On Thursday, 26 February 2015 01:17:35 UTC+11, Erwin wrote:
> > > Op woensdag 25 februari 2015 13:36:55 UTC+1 schreef Derek Asirvadem:
> > >
> > > I have received no submissions. ...
> > >
> > > This is proof that you guys cannot Normalise anything.
> > >
> >
> > Vaguely reminiscent of "post hoc ergo propter hoc".
>
> You can't even read Latin, let alone choose the correct expression.
>
> The evidenced fact, from which you cannot escape is,
>
> ____ post impugnatio, ex fuga
>
> Which of course, you would shrink from, and twist into, electus via.
>
> amentis
>
> vermiculus
>
> The only reminiscence is:
> ____ In itinere in Babylonem
> ___ _post clades
> ____ post interitum
> ____ post servitutem
>
> LMAO!
Ok, it appears the theoreticians as a whole do not have your problem. They can do the arithmetic: three weeks; zero valid submissions. They don't need more time to disprove what has been proved.

But there is at least one of you with special needs. Very very special. Since you have reading problems, as evidenced many times, let me remind you that the floor is still open.

> On Wednesday, 25 February 2015 23:36:55 UTC+11, Derek Asirvadem wrote:
>
> Alternately, is there anyone out there who can save a tiny bit of theoretical face, and Normalise the 38 attributes, the 7 tables given.

Be my guest. Go ahead, take the opportunity you have been begging for. Penetrate the vagueness and prove something. Received on Thu Feb 26 2015 - 03:57:34 CET