Re: Does the phrase " Russell's paradox " should be replaced with another phrase?

On 2015-02-25, vldm10 <vldm10_at_yahoo.com> wrote: 8>< --------
> In his paper RM/T, section 3, E. Codd wrote: "A database so structured
> will then consist of two parts: a regular part consisting of a collection
> of time-varying relations of assorted degree (this is sometimes called
> the extension) and an irregular part consisting of predicate logic
> formulas that are relatively stable over time (this is sometimes called
> the intention, although it may not be what the logicians Russell and
> Whitehead originally intended by this word)"

That should be "intension", not intention.

Eric

-- 
ms fnd in a lbry