Re: The Theoretical Void in the relational Database Space - Normalisation
From: Derek Asirvadem <derek.asirvadem_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:58:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <237da60f-d09a-4309-a78e-b380efe8014d_at_googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:58:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <237da60f-d09a-4309-a78e-b380efe8014d_at_googlegroups.com>
> On Thursday, 26 February 2015 01:17:35 UTC+11, Erwin  wrote:
> > Op woensdag 25 februari 2015 13:36:55 UTC+1 schreef Derek Asirvadem:
> > 
> > I have received no submissions.  ...
> > 
> > This is proof that you guys cannot Normalise anything.
> > 
> 
> Vaguely reminiscent of "post hoc ergo propter hoc".
You can't even read Latin, let alone choose the correct expression.
The evidenced fact, from which you cannot escape is,
____ post impugnatio, ex fuga
Which of course, you would shrink from, and twist into, electus via.
amentis
vermiculus
The only reminiscence is:
____ In itinere in Babylonem ___ _post clades ____ post interitum ____ post servitutem
LMAO! Received on Wed Feb 25 2015 - 17:58:57 CET
