Re: The Theoretical Void in the relational Database Space - Normalisation

From: Derek Asirvadem <derek.asirvadem_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:58:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <237da60f-d09a-4309-a78e-b380efe8014d_at_googlegroups.com>


> On Thursday, 26 February 2015 01:17:35 UTC+11, Erwin wrote:
> > Op woensdag 25 februari 2015 13:36:55 UTC+1 schreef Derek Asirvadem:
> >
> > I have received no submissions. ...
> >
> > This is proof that you guys cannot Normalise anything.
> >
>
> Vaguely reminiscent of "post hoc ergo propter hoc".

You can't even read Latin, let alone choose the correct expression.

The evidenced fact, from which you cannot escape is,

____ post impugnatio, ex fuga

Which of course, you would shrink from, and twist into, electus via.

amentis

vermiculus

The only reminiscence is:

____ In itinere in Babylonem
___ _post clades
____ post interitum
____ post servitutem

LMAO! Received on Wed Feb 25 2015 - 17:58:57 CET

Original text of this message