Re: The Theoretical Void in the relational Database Space - Normalisation

From: Erwin <e.smout_at_myonline.be>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:17:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <db2c9174-7d8a-4c11-96c0-d5c9ce219e72_at_googlegroups.com>

Op woensdag 25 februari 2015 13:36:55 UTC+1 schreef Derek Asirvadem:
>
> I have received no submissions. ...
>
> This is proof that you guys cannot Normalise anything.
>

Vaguely reminiscent of "post hoc ergo propter hoc". Received on Wed Feb 25 2015 - 15:17:33 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: vldm10: "Re: Does the phrase " Russell's paradox " should be replaced with another phrase?"
Previous message: Derek Asirvadem: "Re: The Theoretical Void in the relational Database Space - Normalisation"
In reply to: Derek Asirvadem: "The Theoretical Void in the relational Database Space - Normalisation"
Next in thread: Derek Asirvadem: "Re: The Theoretical Void in the relational Database Space - Normalisation"
Reply: Derek Asirvadem: "Re: The Theoretical Void in the relational Database Space - Normalisation"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message