Re: The Terrific Trio

From: Bob Badour <>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:42:48 -0400
Message-ID: <47cad90a$0$4070$>

H. S. Lahman wrote:

> Responding to Cressey...
> OK, I will bite and assume this is not simply an attempt to be
> completely facetious...

>> I've been mulling over the discussion  about mixing OO and DB,  with 
>> an eye
>> towards coming up with a system that  permits an object world and a
>> relational schema to interact and collaborate productively.  So far, I've
>> got three components that each cover a piece of the territory.

> Why? It seems to me the existing technologies are more than adequate.
> The RAD IDEs and layered model infrastructures already have CRUD/USER
> processing well covered.
> For non-CRUD/USER applications one can abstract the existing RDB
> paradigm once in a subsystem. Then one can reuse that subsystem across
> applications by simply providing an application-specific interface
> (think: Facade pattern) and an external configuration file to map
> identity through that interface.

What a dumb idea! By what measure is that supposed to be better than application views?!? I am sticking with CURLY! Received on Sun Mar 02 2008 - 17:42:48 CET

Original text of this message