Re: Mixing OO and DB
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:45:01 -0400
Message-ID: <47cad98e$0$4070$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>>frebe <freb..._at_gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>>>> You've asked this before and it has been fully answered.
>>>>>>The two components change at different rates for different
>>>>>>reasons, especially in distributed applications and when the
>>>>>>database supports multiple applications.
>>
>>>>>The only answer so far is about "denormailzation for perforance",
>>>>>which is a very debatable argument.
>>
>>>> It's not debatable at all.
>>
>>>Ok, show me an example of such schema change that wouldn't affect
>>>the application code.
>>
>> Denormalization for performance is just such a schema change.
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:45:01 -0400
Message-ID: <47cad98e$0$4070$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
frebe wrote:
> On 2 Mar, 15:45, Patrick May <p..._at_spe.com> wrote: >
>>frebe <freb..._at_gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>>>> You've asked this before and it has been fully answered.
>>>>>>The two components change at different rates for different
>>>>>>reasons, especially in distributed applications and when the
>>>>>>database supports multiple applications.
>>
>>>>>The only answer so far is about "denormailzation for perforance",
>>>>>which is a very debatable argument.
>>
>>>> It's not debatable at all.
>>
>>>Ok, show me an example of such schema change that wouldn't affect
>>>the application code.
>>
>> Denormalization for performance is just such a schema change.
"Denormalization for performance" is an unmistakable sign of abject ignorance. Received on Sun Mar 02 2008 - 17:45:01 CET