Re: The Terrific Trio
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:35:51 GMT
Responding to Badour...
>>> I've been mulling over the discussion about mixing OO and DB, with
>>> an eye
>>> towards coming up with a system that permits an object world and a
>>> relational schema to interact and collaborate productively. So far,
>>> got three components that each cover a piece of the territory.
>> Why? It seems to me the existing technologies are more than adequate.
>> The RAD IDEs and layered model infrastructures already have CRUD/USER
>> processing well covered.
>> For non-CRUD/USER applications one can abstract the existing RDB
>> paradigm once in a subsystem. Then one can reuse that subsystem across
>> applications by simply providing an application-specific interface
>> (think: Facade pattern) and an external configuration file to map
>> identity through that interface.
> > What a dumb idea! By what measure is that supposed to be better than > application views?!? I am sticking with CURLY!
Design reuse, implementation reuse, enhanced productivity, reduced defects, and storage paradigm transparency.
-- There is nothing wrong with me that could not be cured by a capful of Drano. H. S. Lahman hsl_at_pathfindermda.com Pathfinder Solutions http://www.pathfindermda.com blog: http://pathfinderpeople.blogs.com/hslahman "Model-Based Translation: The Next Step in Agile Development". Email info_at_pathfindermda.com for your copy. Pathfinder is hiring: http://www.pathfindermda.com/about_us/careers_pos3.php. (888)OOA-PATHReceived on Mon Mar 03 2008 - 16:35:51 CET