Re: The Terrific Trio

From: Bob Badour <>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:40:33 -0400
Message-ID: <47cc2a03$0$4039$>

H. S. Lahman wrote:

> Responding to Badour...

>>>> I've been mulling over the discussion about mixing OO and DB, with
>>>> an eye
>>>> towards coming up with a system that permits an object world and a
>>>> relational schema to interact and collaborate productively. So far,
>>>> I've
>>>> got three components that each cover a piece of the territory.
>>> Why? It seems to me the existing technologies are more than adequate.
>>> The RAD IDEs and layered model infrastructures already have CRUD/USER
>>> processing well covered.
>>> For non-CRUD/USER applications one can abstract the existing RDB
>>> paradigm once in a subsystem. Then one can reuse that subsystem
>>> across applications by simply providing an application-specific
>>> interface (think: Facade pattern) and an external configuration file
>>> to map identity through that interface.
>> What a dumb idea! By what measure is that supposed to be better than
>> application views?!? I am sticking with CURLY!
> Design reuse, implementation reuse, enhanced productivity, reduced 
> defects, and storage paradigm transparency.

Bullshit. Received on Mon Mar 03 2008 - 17:40:33 CET

Original text of this message