Re: The Terrific Trio
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:40:33 -0400
Message-ID: <47cc2a03$0$4039$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>>> to map identity through that interface.
>>
>> What a dumb idea! By what measure is that supposed to be better than
>> application views?!? I am sticking with CURLY!
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:40:33 -0400
Message-ID: <47cc2a03$0$4039$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
H. S. Lahman wrote:
> Responding to Badour... >>>> interface (think: Facade pattern) and an external configuration file
>>>> I've been mulling over the discussion about mixing OO and DB, with
>>>> an eye
>>>> towards coming up with a system that permits an object world and a
>>>> relational schema to interact and collaborate productively. So far,
>>>> I've
>>>> got three components that each cover a piece of the territory.
>>>
>>>
>>> Why? It seems to me the existing technologies are more than adequate.
>>>
>>> The RAD IDEs and layered model infrastructures already have CRUD/USER
>>> processing well covered.
>>>
>>> For non-CRUD/USER applications one can abstract the existing RDB
>>> paradigm once in a subsystem. Then one can reuse that subsystem
>>> across applications by simply providing an application-specific
>>> to map identity through that interface.
>>
>> What a dumb idea! By what measure is that supposed to be better than
>> application views?!? I am sticking with CURLY!
> > Design reuse, implementation reuse, enhanced productivity, reduced > defects, and storage paradigm transparency.
Bullshit. Received on Mon Mar 03 2008 - 17:40:33 CET