Oracle FAQ
Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?jscript"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <A HREF="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?banner=NonSSI;page=01" TARGET="_blank" onMouseOver="window.status='Click here! Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors.';return true" onMouseOut="window.status='';return true"> <IMG SRC="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?page=01" HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=468 ALT="Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors. Click here!" BORDER=0> </A> </NOSCRIPT>
Home
->
Community
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
22 messages
:
Starting
Wed Feb 09 2005 - 05:50:11 CST,
Ending
Wed Feb 09 2005 - 22:40:39 CST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 13:04:41 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 13:12:23 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Jonathan Leffler
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 01:18:10 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 03:14:12 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 20:20:18 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 03:58:54 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 07:19:09 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Jonathan Leffler
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 00:49:43 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 10:00:56 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 19:26:35 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Jonathan Leffler
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 03:14:33 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 00:10:19 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 09:58:05 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Jonathan Leffler
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 21:44:21 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 09:58:20 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 14:25:16 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Roy Hann
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 11:49:25 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 22:40:39 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Roy Hann
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 05:58:06 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 07:56:05 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 09:09:57 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 09:38:05 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 09:52:21 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Roy Hann
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 13:22:13 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 08:57:58 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Paul
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 07:35:04 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 05:50:11 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
David Cressey
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 07:11:55 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dan
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 08:09:41 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 09:36:17 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 09:00:08 CST)
Re: Pearson-r in SQL
-CELKO-
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 08:19:52 CST)
So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 19:52:25 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Dan
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 20:07:21 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 20:26:17 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 20:42:21 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 10:12:10 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 01:17:05 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
strider5
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 02:42:20 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Alfredo Novoa
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 05:45:24 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 12:29:06 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
paul c
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 12:58:45 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 13:11:02 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
paul c
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 14:19:01 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 15:53:17 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
paul c
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 16:04:18 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 16:45:26 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
paul c
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 19:09:09 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Paul
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 04:29:25 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Dan
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 15:39:00 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 10:24:34 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Paul
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 14:30:57 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 04:19:51 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Paul
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 05:48:33 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 08:12:51 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Dan
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 16:02:29 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 04:58:13 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
paul c
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 14:39:35 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 15:57:56 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 13:02:22 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 13:15:24 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 15:28:45 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 11:40:51 CST)
Relational lattice
Vadim Tropashko
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 10:28:38 CST)
Re: Relational lattice
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 12:10:40 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 14:39:51 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 16:10:29 CST)
Re: So let me get this right:
Christopher Browne
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 21:19:10 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 08:57:44 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 12:00:17 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 06:28:55 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 08:41:09 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Mon Feb 14 2005 - 07:17:01 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Mon Feb 14 2005 - 11:52:15 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Mon Feb 14 2005 - 16:36:33 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Mon Feb 14 2005 - 17:29:29 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Feb 14 2005 - 17:50:03 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Tue Feb 15 2005 - 09:02:47 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Tue Feb 15 2005 - 08:38:13 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 09:38:22 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 13:07:03 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 17:46:13 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 18:52:48 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 02:02:02 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 06:08:58 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 13:05:06 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 21:19:50 CST)
Last message date
:
Wed Feb 09 2005 - 22:40:39 CST
Archived on
: Mon Feb 28 2005 - 23:02:02 CST
22 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
