Re: Developper 2000 master/detail

From: Curtis <cmarchand_at_norambar.ca>
Date: 13 May 2004 09:00:08 -0700
Message-ID: <77459c6d.0405130800.2dacbe1c_at_posting.google.com>


"Jan Gelbrich" <j_gelbrich_at_westfalen-blatt.de> wrote in message news:<2ggm42F2hpa1U1_at_uni-berlin.de>...
> "Curtis" <cmarchand_at_norambar.ca> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:77459c6d.0405120408.1329ba2_at_posting.google.com...
> > Hi I'm using Dev2000 designer
> >
> > Forms [32 Bit] Version 4.5.10.6.0 (Production)
> > Oracle Toolkit Version 2.3.7.2.0 (Production)
> > PL/SQL Version 1.2.5.0.5 (Production)
> > Oracle Procedure Builder V1.5.8.0.0 - Production
> > Oracle Virtual Graphics System Version 2.1.12.9.0 (Production)
> > Oracle Tools GUI Utilities Version 1.2.4.0.0 (Production)
> > Oracle Multimedia Version 2.0.8.1.0 (Production)
> > Oracle Tools Integration Version 1.2.1.6.0 (Production)
> > Oracle Tools Common Area Version 2.0.5.0.0
> > Oracle CORE Version 4.0.3.0.0 - Production
> >
>
> Now, *that* is the kind of background info we need - You are a real Vorbild
> 8)
>
> OK: Generally, Forms 4.5 is outdated for ages; 5 is also antiquated, 6i is
> the last Version
> supporting Client/Server. 7 or 8 never existed, 9i only supports 3-tier with
> a browser.
>
> > and I'm trying to get block2 that as join condition with block1 to
> > fill multi-record block2 according to multi-record block1.
> > Block2 has block1 as master block with join condition
> > I get only 1 record in block2 that changes when I scroll
> > thru block1.
> >
> > Ex.: Block1 Block2
> > record1 Name Family_Name
> > record2 Name
> > record3 Name
> >
> > Record1 Block2 Changes when I go to record2
> > record2 block2 should be populated after query but it is not
> >
> > I wonder if this is the right way to approach this?
>
> So far: yes. But maybe the direction of the M-D relationship should be
> opposite ?
> That is what it sounds and looks like ... 1 Family_Name : N Names ...
> Check also the data model in the database (FKs etc).
>
> hth, Jan

Nope , same thing.
No madder direction of relationship block2 only displays 1 record even thow displayed record is 10 like block 1. Only record 1 of block2 changes.

Curtis Received on Thu May 13 2004 - 18:00:08 CEST

Original text of this message