Re: Developper 2000 master/detail

From: Jan Gelbrich <j_gelbrich_at_westfalen-blatt.de>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 09:20:08 +0200
Message-ID: <2ggm42F2hpa1U1_at_uni-berlin.de>


[Quoted] [Quoted] "Curtis" <cmarchand_at_norambar.ca> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:77459c6d.0405120408.1329ba2_at_posting.google.com...
> Hi I'm using Dev2000 designer
>
> Forms [32 Bit] Version 4.5.10.6.0 (Production)
> Oracle Toolkit Version 2.3.7.2.0 (Production)
> PL/SQL Version 1.2.5.0.5 (Production)
> Oracle Procedure Builder V1.5.8.0.0 - Production
> Oracle Virtual Graphics System Version 2.1.12.9.0 (Production)
> Oracle Tools GUI Utilities Version 1.2.4.0.0 (Production)
> Oracle Multimedia Version 2.0.8.1.0 (Production)
> Oracle Tools Integration Version 1.2.1.6.0 (Production)
> Oracle Tools Common Area Version 2.0.5.0.0
> Oracle CORE Version 4.0.3.0.0 - Production
>

Now, *that* is the kind of background info we need - You are a real Vorbild 8)

[Quoted] OK: Generally, Forms 4.5 is outdated for ages; 5 is also antiquated, 6i is the last Version
[Quoted] supporting Client/Server. 7 or 8 never existed, 9i only supports 3-tier with a browser.

> and I'm trying to get block2 that as join condition with block1 to
> fill multi-record block2 according to multi-record block1.
> Block2 has block1 as master block with join condition
> I get only 1 record in block2 that changes when I scroll
> thru block1.
>
> Ex.: Block1 Block2
> record1 Name Family_Name
> record2 Name
> record3 Name
>
> Record1 Block2 Changes when I go to record2
> record2 block2 should be populated after query but it is not
>
> I wonder if this is the right way to approach this?

So far: yes. But maybe the direction of the M-D relationship should be opposite ?
That is what it sounds and looks like ... 1 Family_Name : N Names ... Check also the data model in the database (FKs etc).

hth, Jan Received on Thu May 13 2004 - 09:20:08 CEST

Original text of this message