Re: Zip version of Workbench 6.3.9

From: Peter H. Coffin <hellsop_at_ninehells.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:13:06 -0500
Message-ID: <slrnod5q72.t3q.hellsop_at_nibelheim.ninehells.com>


On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 02:44:12 -0700 (PDT), djburbridge_at_gmail.com wrote:

> By "portable" I meant the commonly accepted definition of "I can unzip
> it to somewhere on my hard drive or a USB stick and it works with no
> other installation and minimal setup (basically just entering the
> connection details), without it trying to write to the registry".
>
> This was possible with previous versions of Workbench - I was
> wondering why the developers had decided that they just *had* to be
> able to write to the registry?
>
> For anyone who's also wondering, https://www.heidisql.com/ looks like
> a reasonable alternative, which works exactly as I've described.

Did you try it? Nevermind, I know you didn't. Because if you had tried it, and just told it "nevermind about the c:\ thing. Just put it on this USB drive" then you would know that you can then unplug the USB drive, plug it into another Windows computer, and launch the Workbench.exe file, it'll work just fine thank you.

But, hey, who am I to spoil a perfectly good rage hard-on? Go on, tell us some more about how terrible this is and how they're preventing you from doing something. I'm all ears and suppressed giggles...

-- 
Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which 
the only specification is that it should run noiselessly.
Received on Wed Mar 22 2017 - 22:13:06 CET

Original text of this message