Re: Zip version of Workbench 6.3.9

From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex_at_attglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:17:05 -0400
Message-ID: <oatpqb$1nt$1_at_jstuckle.eternal-september.org>


On 3/22/2017 5:44 AM, djburbridge_at_gmail.com wrote:
> By "portable" I meant the commonly accepted definition of "I can unzip it to somewhere on my hard drive or a USB stick and it works with no other installation and minimal setup (basically just entering the connection details), without it trying to write to the registry".
>
> This was possible with previous versions of Workbench - I was wondering why the developers had decided that they just *had* to be able to write to the registry?
>
> For anyone who's also wondering, https://www.heidisql.com/ looks like a reasonable alternative, which works exactly as I've described.
>

Who knows - maybe it has something to do with tracking versions, file locations or lots of other things. Most programs use the registry in some form or another. Even MySQL itself does. I see no problem with the workbench using it.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex_at_attglobal.net
==================
Received on Wed Mar 22 2017 - 13:17:05 CET

Original text of this message