Re: foundations of relational theory?

"Joe" <avoidingspam_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:bnsf67$14s3bj$1_at_ID-49604.news.uni-berlin.de...
> bbadour_at_golden.net (Bob Badour) wrote in
> news:cd3b3cf.0310300617.1e902652_at_posting.google.com:
>
> > cmurthi <xyzcmurthi_at_quest.with.a.w.net> wrote in message
> > news:<3F9FEB3A.9090508_at_quest.with.a.w.net>...
> >> Please, Jeffrey, don't bother to engage in a pissing context; let
> >> BB stew in his own poisonous words. There are others with whom we
> >> can debate reasonably.
> >>
> >> Oh, and someone capable of saying "A well-designed base database
> >> will require few or no complex constraints" is obviously living in
> >> an alternate universe and not worthy of serious consideration.
> >
> > If you mean a universe with better data management products than
> > Pick, then yes, I live in a different universe than you. I live in
> > the real one.
>
> That's good. A guy from comp.databases.theory claiming to live in the
> real world. Bob, to quote you, you're an idiot.

Theory exists in the real world and exists to describe the real world. You are the idiot. Received on Fri Oct 31 2003 - 15:15:46 CET