Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:13:15 -0500
Message-ID: <bntqkq$nv2$1_at_mantis.golden.net>


"Steve Lancour" <stevel_at_lancour.com> wrote in message news:CsGdnZoN95XJJjyiRVn-jw_at_comcast.com...
> Mikito Harakiri wrote:
>
> > "Steve Lancour" <stevel_at_lancour.com> wrote in message
> > news:mKudnYI38-U5KTyiRVn-gw_at_comcast.com...
> >
> >>No, I postulate only one mistake. If the DBA makes a mistake in setting
> >>up the constraint the applications may be perfect and yet still corrupt
> >>data. Same as if there were a mistake in the example Pick code I
posted.
> >
> >
> > A mistake in high abstraction language is much less likely then in low
level
> > language.
> >
> >
>
> I don't know. Perhaps. But if we can agree that the QA efforts on both

We cannot agree on that point. There are too many database operations that never go through QA. Received on Fri Oct 31 2003 - 15:13:15 CET

Original text of this message