Re: foundations of relational theory?
From: robert <gnuoytr_at_rcn.com>
Date: 1 Oct 2003 15:10:19 -0700
Message-ID: <da3c2186.0310011410.4b4f66be_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 1 Oct 2003 15:10:19 -0700
Message-ID: <da3c2186.0310011410.4b4f66be_at_posting.google.com>
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message news:<xSXcb.199$vQ6.25394285_at_mantis.golden.net>...
<snip>
> SQL does not define the relational model. In fact, it deviates significantly
> "Ryan Gaffuri" <rgaffuri_at_cox.net> wrote in message
> news:1efdad5b.0309260259.393522ae_at_posting.google.com...
> from the relational model, and
> SQL99 basically abandons the relational model outright.
yikes!!!! i don't remember either celko or date being so gloomy; and neither has been a fan of SQL all that much. is there a link (or your own 25 words or less) which explains why?
robert Received on Thu Oct 02 2003 - 00:10:19 CEST