Re: Why use Java Stored Procedures....

"HansF" <News.Hans_at_telus.net> wrote in message news:pan.2006.03.04.23.59.29.686441_at_telus.net...
> On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 23:26:47 +0000, Bob Jones wrote:
>
>>
>> "HansF" <News.Hans_at_telus.net> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2006.03.03.20.05.02.904786_at_telus.net...
>>> On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:13:49 +0000, Bob Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Would you rather have a Java programmer migrating Java stored
>>>> procedures
>>>> to
>>>> a different database or have a PL/SQL programmer migrating PL/SQL
>>>> stored
>>>> procedures to a foreign language for a different database?
>>>
>>> Help me out here .... which other databases use Java natively for Stored
>>> Procedures.
>>>
>>> I'm not asking which databases can interact with or be used by Java.
>>> Which ones allow Java to be stored and run under control of the database
>>> kernel.
>>>
>>
>> I am not sure what you meant by "native". What makes Java a native
>> language
>> only to Oracle but not to others?
>
> OK - let's simplify.
>
> Which databases can use JAVA *STORED PROCEDURES*. That is, procedures
> that are stored in the database.
>
>>

Aside from Microsoft databases, most well-known databases support java stored procedures. After all, the main benefit of Java is platform independent. The more vendor support, the better it is for the technology. Received on Sun Mar 05 2006 - 12:29:05 CST