Re: How to normalize this?
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:47:27 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <e8722d25-e39c-46af-908d-d173947e51d0_at_googlegroups.com>
On Thursday, 14 February 2013 11:57:08 UTC+11, James K. Lowden wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:01:14 -0800 (PST) Derek Asirvadem wrote:
>
> > Codd's "time-varying relations" are specifically about consistency.
>
> I'm not sure why you say that? I was thinking of, for example,
>
> < one sentence from the RM snipped >
Yeah, sure. Codd used the term five times in that paper.
> > Codd's "time-varying relations" are specifically about consistency.
I stated:
> > Codd's "time-varying relations" are specifically about consistency. Your post is illustrative enough without making the reference. Your answer is about Constraints, and sensible ones, not "time-varying relations".
Rather than "why do you say that?", perhaps it is up to you, since you made the reference, and it is being questioned, to identify how your example is related to Codd's "time-varying relations" and Consistency requirements thereof. If you were using the term in a general sense, which now appears to be the case, given that you have quoted the first introduction of it, and not in the particular sense that Codd discussed it in detail (Database Consistency), then just say so.
> ... for those following along at home ...
I don't think anyone cares about the skirmishes you are having with me about minor issues.
Cheers
Derek
Received on Thu Feb 14 2013 - 22:47:27 CET