Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:47:05 -0700
David BL <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
>On Jun 12, 3:46 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 10, 11:34 am, jaygarri..._at_gmail.com wrote:
>> > On Jun 10, 9:55 am, Gene Wirchenko <ge..._at_ocis.net> wrote:
>> > >If you had to pick one, which would you pick words of wisdom or
>> > >agreeableness?
>> > That's a false and self-serving dichotomy.
>> He presented it as a hypothetical, not a dichotomy. Since
>> it's not a dichotomy, it can't be a false dichotomy.
>Actually it's a standard terminology for considering "black and white"
It is also used for setting priorities.
>Gene's question involves a hypothetical dichotomy. I interpreted the
>response as simply saying it's an irrelevant question because the
>antecedent is generally false. If you see relevance in the question,
>what is it exactly?
>It's like someone wanting to justify euthanasia and asking: "If you
>had to choose between laws allowing murder and euthanasia, which one
>would you pick?"
Bad example. Euthanasia might be considered a subset of murder. Neither wisdom nor agreeableness is a subset of the other.
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Fri Jun 12 2009 - 18:47:05 CEST