Re: The term "theory" as in "database theory"

From: <michael_at_preece.net>
Date: 27 Jan 2007 15:00:47 -0800
Message-ID: <1169938847.203824.109920_at_a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>


On Jan 27, 10:55 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Marshall wrote:
> > On Jan 27, 12:06 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >>[...] I suggest anyone who is interested go back and read
> >>the first few posts I addressed to [...]
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.theory/browse_thread/
> > thread/a21a30b6a663dab3
>
> >>From that thread:
>
> > On Oct. 13, 2003 12:54 PM, Seun Osewa wrote:
>
> >>Ok, I think what we need to do is come up with an illustrative
> >>example. A particular simple application which Dawn can use to
> >>demonstrate the advantages of the MV model. And then our knowledgeable
> >>relational model advocates can use the same example to "debunk" her
> >>claims.Hmmm.... google groups does not appear to be complete.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -

The link still works though - you simply have to perform a join. Received on Sun Jan 28 2007 - 00:00:47 CET

Original text of this message