Re: The term "theory" as in "database theory"

On 27 Jan 2007 15:00:47 -0800, michael_at_preece.net wrote:

>
>
>On Jan 27, 10:55 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> Marshall wrote:
>> > On Jan 27, 12:06 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>> >>[...] I suggest anyone who is interested go back and read
>> >>the first few posts I addressed to [...]
>>
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.theory/browse_thread/
>> > thread/a21a30b6a663dab3
>>
>> >>From that thread:
>>
>> > On Oct. 13, 2003 12:54 PM, Seun Osewa wrote:
>>
>> >>Ok, I think what we need to do is come up with an illustrative
>> >>example. A particular simple application which Dawn can use to
>> >>demonstrate the advantages of the MV model. And then our knowledgeable
>> >>relational model advocates can use the same example to "debunk" her
>> >>claims.Hmmm.... google groups does not appear to be complete.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
>
>The link still works though - you simply have to perform a join.

Such a pity ahbou doesn't like in-jokes.

Lemming

-- 
Curiosity *may* have killed Schrodinger's cat.