Re: The term "theory" as in "database theory"
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:55:24 GMT
Message-ID: <wLQuh.5991$1x.103488_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:55:24 GMT
Message-ID: <wLQuh.5991$1x.103488_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Marshall wrote:
> On Jan 27, 12:06 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>[...] I suggest anyone who is interested go back and read
>>the first few posts I addressed to [...]
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.theory/browse_thread/
> thread/a21a30b6a663dab3
>
>>From that thread:
>
> On Oct. 13, 2003 12:54 PM, Seun Osewa wrote:
>
>>Ok, I think what we need to do is come up with an illustrative >>example. A particular simple application which Dawn can use to >>demonstrate the advantages of the MV model. And then our knowledgeable >>relational model advocates can use the same example to "debunk" her >>claims.
Hmmm.... google groups does not appear to be complete. Received on Sat Jan 27 2007 - 23:55:24 CET