Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside

Dmitry Shuklin wrote:
> Hi Cimode
>
> > Implementing an elementary storage retrieval mechanism for targetted
> > purpose is one thing and does not allow to claim it makes a logical
> > model for data management. Implementing a general purpose DBMS creates
> > a need to answer several logical questions about operations, data
> > integrity, correctenedd etc...Check other posts for what kind of
> > operations and characteristics your technology needs to support to be
> > sound...Good luck ;)
>
> yes i know that current version is not prefect and has many limitations
> which current RDBMS doesn't have. But rectrictions of current version
> doesn't make all idea wrong. may be the same complex question -
> transaction isolation. for OODBMS with active server it more complex
> task then for RDBMS
But transaction isolation is an imperative requirement to set up a DBMS. Are you saying that you have not succeeded (yet?) into setting it up?

> many of OODB can't implement object views and joins. current version of
> my DB can. also current version already supports undo/redo
> transactions. It makes sense to use this DBMS as document file format
> in CAD/CAM applications.
Received on Wed Jul 05 2006 - 10:25:04 CEST