Re: OO solution?

Keith H Duggar wrote:
> kvnkrkptrck_at_gmail.com wrote:
> > I mean, for crying out loud, didn't "Synchronizing the
> > Viewers' Serializable ArrayLists of Documents" even give
> > you a clue - even a moment of pause?
>
> Most intriguing. I will admit that this sentence (from your
> original post) gave me the most pause:
>
> > I'll bet the application code would all but write itself.
>
> however I failed to conclude it was satire. As Erk pointed
> out, the writing is so similar to what one actually reads in
> OO literature and from OO /mentors/ and such that it could
> honestly go either way. And given the recent activity in
> c.d.t it would not be surprising had this been a genuine
> "solution" :-)
>
> -- Keith -- Fraud 6

All, my apologies. After reading these responses, I read the posts I made in a new light, and realized that coming from a new user to a newsgroup - and with a good probability of said user being a OO enthusiast from the c.o. group - the parody was not nearly as overt as I intended.

In lieu of that, I truly am sorry for any time anyone may have spent formulating, composing or posting legitimate replies to the posts. Yes, that includes Bob. Received on Tue Jun 27 2006 - 21:39:51 CEST