Re: OO solution?
From: <kvnkrkptrck_at_gmail.com>
Date: 27 Jun 2006 12:39:51 -0700
Message-ID: <1151437191.362150.277420_at_p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
Date: 27 Jun 2006 12:39:51 -0700
Message-ID: <1151437191.362150.277420_at_p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
Keith H Duggar wrote:
> kvnkrkptrck_at_gmail.com wrote:
> > I mean, for crying out loud, didn't "Synchronizing the
> > Viewers' Serializable ArrayLists of Documents" even give
> > you a clue - even a moment of pause?
>
> Most intriguing. I will admit that this sentence (from your
> original post) gave me the most pause:
>
> > I'll bet the application code would all but write itself.
>
> however I failed to conclude it was satire. As Erk pointed
> out, the writing is so similar to what one actually reads in
> OO literature and from OO /mentors/ and such that it could
> honestly go either way. And given the recent activity in
> c.d.t it would not be surprising had this been a genuine
> "solution" :-)
>
> -- Keith -- Fraud 6