Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:06:39 GMT
Message-ID: <3dikg.34687$IK3.6976_at_pd7tw1no>
> The basic premise of this thread was to suggest that physical issues
> may restrict faithfull representation of relvars and asking the
> question on whether OO mechanisms could help ...
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:06:39 GMT
Message-ID: <3dikg.34687$IK3.6976_at_pd7tw1no>
Cimode wrote:
> paul c a écrit :
>
>> Cimode wrote: >>> paul c wrote: >>>> Cimode wrote: >>>>> paul c wrote: >>>>>> Cimode wrote: >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>...
> The basic premise of this thread was to suggest that physical issues
> may restrict faithfull representation of relvars and asking the
> question on whether OO mechanisms could help ...
If so, the thread should restrict itself to relvars and OO mechanisms (e.g., inheritance).
> ... representation through N-ary physical scheme)...If I am not mistaken a
> non-sequiturs involve false premice. ...
I'd say you are mistaken, so 'not mistaken' is a false premise.
p Received on Thu Jun 15 2006 - 21:06:39 CEST