Re: Lets get physical

From: paul c <>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:58:50 GMT
Message-ID: <K5ikg.33070$iF6.29784_at_pd7tw2no>

J M Davitt wrote:

> Cimode wrote:

>> paul c wrote:
>>> Like some others here (as best as I can recall), I've puzzled over
>>> comments such as the TRM not being a physical layer.
>> Anybody who stated has not a clue about RM...What a stupid
>> comment...who advocated that? I certainly did'nt...
>> ...

FP, I think. Might find it at Not sure about CJ Date.

p Received on Thu Jun 15 2006 - 20:58:50 CEST

Original text of this message