Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:16:09 GMT
Message-ID: <tc43g.65123$VV4.1236246_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> I disagree, although my disagreement may be merely a quibble.
>
> I would have said:
>
> " anyone who can understand highschool-level set theory can
> learn to use the relational model."
>
> Even with good undetstanding of highschool-level set theory, there is still
> some additional learning needed to design well and to implement well.
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:16:09 GMT
Message-ID: <tc43g.65123$VV4.1236246_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
David Cressey wrote:
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:2rX2g.65027$VV4.1232702_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>
>>But as I said, anyone who can understand highschool-level set theory can >>use the relational model.
>
> I disagree, although my disagreement may be merely a quibble.
>
> I would have said:
>
> " anyone who can understand highschool-level set theory can
> learn to use the relational model."
>
> Even with good undetstanding of highschool-level set theory, there is still
> some additional learning needed to design well and to implement well.
I used "can" in the meaning "is capable of". Received on Mon Apr 24 2006 - 15:16:09 CEST