Re: Signal to Noise Ration on DBDebunk Declining
From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 16:07:01 -0500
Message-ID: <5LednTf70eFmQhLcRVn-uw_at_comcast.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 16:07:01 -0500
Message-ID: <5LednTf70eFmQhLcRVn-uw_at_comcast.com>
"Ja Lar" <ingen_at_mail.her> wrote in message
news:418fd83a$0$165$edfadb0f_at_dread11.news.tele.dk...
>
> "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> ...
>
> > Has anyone else noticed the signal to noise ration on dbdebunk.com
> > declining over time?
> Yes. Now you have to pay for real information. That is not unfair in
itself,
> but it leaves more noise/signal on the surface.
> Some of the published "exchanges" are not quite fair treated, but is used
to
> draw attention $-publications, rather than answering the questions
properly.
>
> However, it remains a great source for knowlegde in the field.
>
>
Ahh yes! Open source software and pay for papers! What an interesting switch! Received on Mon Nov 08 2004 - 22:07:01 CET