Re: Signal to Noise Ration on DBDebunk Declining

From: Ja Lar <ingen_at_mail.her>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 21:33:51 +0100
Message-ID: <418fd83a$0$165$edfadb0f_at_dread11.news.tele.dk>

"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> ...

> Has anyone else noticed the signal to noise ration on dbdebunk.com
> declining over time?
Yes. Now you have to pay for real information. That is not unfair in itself, but it leaves more noise/signal on the surface. Some of the published "exchanges" are not quite fair treated, but is used to draw attention $-publications, rather than answering the questions properly.

However, it remains a great source for knowlegde in the field. Received on Mon Nov 08 2004 - 21:33:51 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ja Lar: "Re: Relational vs network vs hierarchic databases"
Previous message: Neo: "Re: Demo: Modelling Cost of Travel Paths Between Towns"
In reply to Marshall Spight: "Signal to Noise Ration on DBDebunk Declining"
Next in thread: Mikito Harakiri: "Re: Signal to Noise Ration on DBDebunk Declining"
Reply: Laconic2: "Re: Signal to Noise Ration on DBDebunk Declining"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message