Re: The IDS, the EDS and the DBMS
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 23:58:57 +0200
Message-ID: <413cddac$0$36860$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>
> Agreed.
>
> I might want to rephrase "the same program" as "objects of the same class".
> But I'm not sure of this.
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 23:58:57 +0200
Message-ID: <413cddac$0$36860$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Laconic2 wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote:
>
>>There is some sharing going on here. >>So, let's differentiate. >> >>Persistence is sharing data between multiple subsequent >>instances of the same program. >>Concurrency control and shared access solve the >>problems of sharing data between multiple simultane >>instances of the same program. >>Metadata comes into play when data is shared between >>really different programs. *Really* different as in not >>sharing the same code.
>
> Agreed.
>
> I might want to rephrase "the same program" as "objects of the same class".
> But I'm not sure of this.
I wasn't when trying to formulate this.
In this case "objects of the same class" opens up a
can of irrelevant watchameanbyzats, so I settled
for "program".
> Technical department of client is trying to get more bang for
the buck.
> Marketing department of Vendor organization is trying to get more bucks for
> the bang.
>
> How well do you think they are going to collaborate?
When you're not part of the solution, there is a lot of money to be made in postponing it. Received on Mon Sep 06 2004 - 23:58:57 CEST