Re: SQL for Modelling Generalization Hierarchy
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 23:03:46 +0200
Message-ID: <40b8faae$0$563$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 23:03:46 +0200
Message-ID: <40b8faae$0$563$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote:
>>Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote:
>>
>>>x wrote:
>>>>mAsterdam wrote:
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>>>If it is so frequent, maybe there is some standard solution to it.
>>>>It would be interesting to see why the solution is not obvious.
>>>>Is it the fault of the Relational Model, of SQL
>>>>or of the people involved ?
>>>
>>>yes, yes, no.
>>
>>no, no, maybe.
>>
>>:-)
> > > I'm feeling a disconnect with you, mAster. Dam!
:-(
Maybe we can connect again later.
There is at least one track we join: educating "relational" or "object oriented" as the ultimate truth in database cq. software development is highly damaging, both intellectually and economically.
Friends again? ;-) Received on Sat May 29 2004 - 23:03:46 CEST