Re: SQL for Modelling Generalization Hierarchy
From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 14:28:30 -0500
Message-ID: <c9ao9b$9p4$1_at_news.netins.net>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 14:28:30 -0500
Message-ID: <c9ao9b$9p4$1_at_news.netins.net>
"mAsterdam" <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message
news:40b8e0db$0$563$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
> Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote:
>
> > x wrote:
> >>mAsterdam wrote:
> [snip]
> >>If it is so frequent, maybe there is some standard solution to it.
> >>It would be interesting to see why the solution is not obvious.
> >>Is it the fault of the Relational Model, of SQL
> >>or of the people involved ?
> >
> > yes, yes, no.
>
> no, no, maybe.
>
> :-)
I'm feeling a disconnect with you, mAster. Dam! --dawn Received on Sat May 29 2004 - 21:28:30 CEST