"Mike Sherrill" <MSherrillnonono_at_compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:lab42010rb2tbf1m5d04100if8q1o83ld4_at_4ax.com...
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:12:50 +1000, "Peter Mount"
> <info_at_petermount.au.com> wrote:
>
> >The theory being it's best to keep related data in only one table
>
> It's best to keep related data in related tables.
I would be a lot more comfortable with this discussion if any of you had a
clue about theory. Other than stroking your egos, what does anyone get out
of you being vociferous ignorami?
Received on Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:13:34 CST
