comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Todd Bandrowsky (Tue May 06 2003 - 01:15:48 CEST)
Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Todd Bandrowsky (Tue May 06 2003 - 01:17:01 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 00:17:30 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 01:02:09 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Tue May 06 2003 - 03:47:57 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Tue May 06 2003 - 03:51:41 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Tue May 06 2003 - 04:55:58 CEST)
Re: Table design problem Roy Hann (Tue May 06 2003 - 13:11:48 CEST)
Re: Transactions: good or bad? Nigel Day (Tue May 06 2003 - 13:05:25 CEST)
Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 14:42:38 CEST)
Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Steve Long (Tue May 06 2003 - 18:41:57 CEST)
Re: XML and RDBMS/OODBMS Steve Long (Tue May 06 2003 - 18:50:52 CEST)
Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 18:02:05 CEST)
Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 18:46:27 CEST)
Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 19:07:14 CEST)
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 19:16:05 CEST)
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 19:21:01 CEST)
Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? --CELKO-- (Tue May 06 2003 - 20:08:50 CEST)
Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Paul G. Brown (Tue May 06 2003 - 20:42:15 CEST)
Re: XML and RDBMS/OODBMS Mirch Masala (Tue May 06 2003 - 20:56:19 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Tue May 06 2003 - 21:30:04 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Tue May 06 2003 - 21:35:45 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Tue May 06 2003 - 21:53:10 CEST)
Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Carl Rosenberger (Tue May 06 2003 - 22:04:54 CEST)
Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Carl Rosenberger (Tue May 06 2003 - 22:09:50 CEST)
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Mikito Harakiri (Tue May 06 2003 - 22:07:43 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Tue May 06 2003 - 23:01:21 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Tue May 06 2003 - 23:16:40 CEST)
Re: XML and RDBMS/OODBMS karl wettin (Tue May 06 2003 - 23:02:00 CEST)
Column Naming Question john (Tue May 06 2003 - 00:42:44 CEST)
- Re: Column Naming Question Marshall Spight (Tue May 06 2003 - 03:38:43 CEST)
- Re: Column Naming Question --CELKO-- (Tue May 06 2003 - 20:04:44 CEST)
data modeling multi axis context Scott Buck (Tue May 06 2003 - 01:40:26 CEST)
- Re: data modeling multi axis context Steve Long (Tue May 06 2003 - 18:27:02 CEST)
design problem with fk part of pk in oracle env osy45 (Tue May 06 2003 - 17:35:57 CEST)
- Re: design problem with fk part of pk in oracle env Bert Blink (Tue May 06 2003 - 23:39:49 CEST)
Re: One to One relationships AK (Tue May 06 2003 - 17:38:56 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships Bernard Peek (Tue May 06 2003 - 22:13:52 CEST)
mysql problem help logia (Tue May 06 2003 - 20:16:47 CEST)

Last message date: Tue May 06 2003 - 23:02:00 CEST
Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 11:06:34 CEST

39 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Other periods:[ Previous, Thread view ] [ Next, Thread view ] [ List of Folders ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]