DB required to list multiple D.I.V.O.R.C.E.S. & Re-marriages

From: www.wedding-service.co.uk/ <david_at_wedding-service.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 17:33:41 -0000
Message-ID: <1008783109.18779.0.nnrp-07.c2dead53@news.demon.co.uk>

With many couple getting Divorced and re-married should I have multiple cross referanced fields ?

If a couple re-married the other couple is this M:N ? or 1:1 ?

d_at_ve @llison, Dundee, Scotland
http://www.wedding-service.co.uk/
Allahu Akbar Allahu Akbar La Ilaha Ila Allah Wa Allahu Akbar Allahu Akbar Wa Lillahi Alhamd Received on Wed Dec 19 2001 - 11:33:41 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kendall: "Re: Extendible Hashing question on Splitting to Handle Overflow"
Previous message: JRStern: "Re: Are redundant fields ever appropriate?"
Next in thread: Bernard Peek: "Re: DB required to list multiple D.I.V.O.R.C.E.S. & Re-marriages"
Reply: Bernard Peek: "Re: DB required to list multiple D.I.V.O.R.C.E.S. & Re-marriages"
Reply: --CELKO--: "Re: DB required to list multiple D.I.V.O.R.C.E.S. & Re-marriages"
Reply: James: "Re: DB required to list multiple D.I.V.O.R.C.E.S. & Re-marriages"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US