Re: DB required to list multiple D.I.V.O.R.C.E.S. & Re-marriages

Bernard Peek <bap_at_shrdlu.com> wrote:

> In message <c0d87ec0.0112201043.59809443_at_posting.google.com>, --CELKO--

> In most jurisdictions the assumption is valid. If the application is to
> be universal then it may have to cope with the other forms.

To be truly universal, the solution would have to allow for multiple partner homosexual marriage and for polygynandry (and a mixture of both).

To be *_useful_* however, is quite another thing.

Paul...

> Bernard Peek

--
Paul Linehan

plinehan at yahoo dot com/linehanp at tcd dot ie

I drink to keep body and
soul apart - O. Wilde.

"Mens sana in campari soda" - anon.