Re: OR DB design
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 13:21:24 GMT
Message-ID: <oZtf7.2155$L8.26573_at_typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net>
you're new to newsgroups aren't you ?
"serafim" <serafim_at_nada.kth.se> wrote in message
news:3B7CD7D3.634C3A2E_at_nada.kth.se...
> Steve Long wrote:
> >
> > you're new to this stuff aren't you ?
> >
> What kind of shitty comment is this?
> Saying nothing may be done by being silent. Try it!
>
> Matthew Beale wrote:
> > Why arent Object relatoinal Databases better accepted by the
> > commercial community?
>
> This is not correct. All the big vendors have "universal" RDBMS
> servers on their program. The term (coined by the late Informix
> corporation, I think) stands for an RDMBS extended with object
> capabilities. Apart from Informix, also IBM, Oracle, Sybase,
> postgreSQL, ..... and many more have it.
>
> On my system there are five database servers. They are all ORDBMS.
> All with a different approach to OR, but all the same, they all
> have OR capabilities.
>
> /Serafim
Received on Sat Aug 18 2001 - 15:21:24 CEST