Re: Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.
From: Mark A <ma_at_switchboard.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 16:15:25 -0600
Message-ID: <wGM8b.797$TJ.83525_at_news.uswest.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 16:15:25 -0600
Message-ID: <wGM8b.797$TJ.83525_at_news.uswest.net>
"Jim Kennedy" <kennedy-downwithspammersfamily_at_attbi.net> wrote in message
news:UjM8b.434976
> No, this was a production environment. In the days of client server GUI s
> these might be "labled" ad hoc queries but in fact they were queries to
run
> a production system for NYNEX. The tool did not allow "binding" and
without
> issuing explicit commit statements after every select , insert, or update
> statement everyone else would get locked out of issuing queries or binding
> their plans for the production system. I thought mainframes were for
> production quality code. (and so did ATT)
> Jim
>
Developers should not be doing binds in a production environment.
Received on Sun Sep 14 2003 - 00:15:25 CEST