Re: Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.
From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:58:55 -0700
Message-ID: <1063490318.287901_at_yasure>
Mark A wrote:
The only difference I can possibly think of would be things that are path specific such as c:\temp changing to /opt/.
It isn't about insulting your intelligence ... it is a fact.
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:58:55 -0700
Message-ID: <1063490318.287901_at_yasure>
Sorry to say this but the code base for Oracle is 100% identical between platforms. I can develop on Win98, export tables, data, code, etc. Import directly to any other platform-operating system that Oracle supports and it runs, perfectly, with zero modifications.The DB2 code base for Windows, Linux and Unix is 90% the same.The MVS, VM , and AS/400 products are all different, which is not really a factor since either Oracle doesn't have a product on these platforms, ortheif they do, the Oracle product is universally known to stink on these platforms.If you write stored procedures in C, you will need a compiler, but notsureif it needs to be on the production machine. But if you say so, I would concede that point. Stored procedures may also be written in SQL, which is the preferred method. With regards to the total cost of ownership, I think that you will find DB2 cheaper or the same as Oracle even with thecompilerexpense.When you say "is 90% the same" isn't that just saying they are different without saying it? Sort of like trying to say you are 90% half-pregnant.I don't think anyone should debate TOC as there are no standards by which to judge the accuracy of the statement. Anyone that paid list price for any hardware or software should buy their next car from me. Daniel MorganThe code base for DB2 on Windows, Linux, and Unix is 100% the same except for those things that are operating system specific. Everything that is possible to be the same, is the same on DB2 and that calculates to about 90%. Operating system specific code for DB2 has been isolated into separate modules. The same is true of Oracle. Please don't insult my intelligence by claiming otherwise.
The only difference I can possibly think of would be things that are path specific such as c:\temp changing to /opt/.
It isn't about insulting your intelligence ... it is a fact.
-- Daniel Morgan http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)Received on Sat Sep 13 2003 - 23:58:55 CEST