Re: Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.

From: Larry Edelstein <lsedels_at_us.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:54:24 GMT
Message-ID: <3F6391FA.34E963FB_at_us.ibm.com>


Daniel,

You are right about the flame war (although somehow I don't think we've seen the last of this one yet :-)). But let me tell you one thing: I may not be the most eloquent at describing the flaws or drawbacks of Oracle, but for you to take potshots at DB2 (many of which weren't even valid) and then pretend that Oracle has no drawbacks or flaws is insulting.

Larry Edelstein

Daniel Morgan wrote:

> Larry Edelstein wrote:
>

> >Jim,
> >
> >I can't answer your assertion to this level of detail ... I'll leave that to
> >someone else from the lab who knows more about the DB2 concurrency model. I can
> >tell you that
> >
> >- I'm not sure that this is accurate ... "turns dynamic SQL into static SQL"?
> >- even if it is, you are talking about an experience on DB2/MVS from years ago
> >- there are drawbacks about Oracle's concurrency model also. I believe that the
> >lock status is maintained on each data block potentially requiring disk access
> >in certain cases.
> >
> ><snipped>
> >
> >
> Speculating about the properties of a product you are not that familiar
> with is like trying to jog across quick sand. While
> I have worked extensively with DB2 it was some years ago so I try to
> step gingerly when discussing specifics. But to
> address your statement ... Oracle doesn't lock blocks. Period. You
> couldn't do it if you tried. And with Oracle dropping
> rollback segments in favor of undo almost all of the traditional
> concerns are gone. I haven't seen an ORA-01555 in more
> than a year. And that's in development. Haven't seen one in production
> on a 9i server since its release.
>
> I do think we should be careful that what started out as one thing has
> the potential to turn into a flame war. I'd suggest
> everyone remember this are tools not religions, take a deep breath, and
> step back form the abyss. Lets be sure to keep
> this discussion professional.
>
> --
> Daniel Morgan
> http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
> http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
> damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
> (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
Received on Sat Sep 13 2003 - 23:54:24 CEST

Original text of this message