Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] SPAM-XML releases under GPL

Open Wound wrote:

> Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1088965897.870494@yasure>...
>

>>Open Wound wrote:
>>
>>>>>>You are promoting a commercial product in usenet groups in which
>>>>>>such activities are explicitly forbidden.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>How is this a commercial product? Just curious.
>>>>
>>>>Read the archives of these groups. 'Free' does not make something a
>>>>non-product. Nor does it make it a non-promotion.
>>>
>>>
>>>You didn't answer the question. How is this a COMMERCIAL product?
>>>No, nothing in the archives of these groups can make it a COMMERCIAL
>>>product either.
>>
>>'Commerical' is irrelevant to it being spam. 

You apparently have an incredibly short attention span:

You: "How is this a COMMERCIAL product?"
Me:  "'Commerical' is irrelevant to it being spam."
You: "why did you find it necessary to mischaracterize it as a 'commercial'"

Anyone with your abilities obviously is incapable of anything more useful than spamming. So please go away as we will label each any every off-topic troll/spam post as it is and we aren't going to stop for because of your pathetically lame excuses.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)