Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] SPAM-XML releases under GPL

[Quoted] Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1088965897.870494_at_yasure>...
> Open Wound wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>You are promoting a commercial product in usenet groups in which
> >>>>such activities are explicitly forbidden.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>How is this a commercial product? Just curious.
> >>
> >>Read the archives of these groups. 'Free' does not make something a
> >>non-product. Nor does it make it a non-promotion.
> >
> >
> > You didn't answer the question. How is this a COMMERCIAL product?
> > No, nothing in the archives of these groups can make it a COMMERCIAL
> > product either.
>
> 'Commerical' is irrelevant to it being spam.

[Quoted] So why did you find it necessary to mischaracterize it as a 'commercial' product? And why did you not admit your mistake when you were called on it? Received on Mon Jul 05 2004 - 01:53:16 CEST