So the only benefit you can get from splitting tables into seperate table
spaces is the ability to place them on different devices?
dave mausner wrote in message <8EB88EA7dlm_at_206.141.192.241>...
>NOrgSPAM_at_mcs-hh.de (Roger) wrote in
><85d5cu$u3s$1_at_opal.hamburg.cityline.net>:
>
>>This is the first step, the next step ist to put this tablespaces on
>>different disks...
>>
>>jgroff <jgroff_at_msn.com> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
>>eamVu$3W$GA.262_at_cpmsnbbsa02...
>>> We're experiencing some performance problems and we had a consultant
>>>suggest
>>> that we split some of the more heavily accessed/updated tables out into
>>> their own dedicated tablespaces.
>
>... provided that the disks are not part of the same raid-5 set.
>--
>dave mausner
Received on Tue Jan 11 2000 - 07:32:59 CST
