Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle on NT server versus Solaris server
8i will take more memory than previous versions, other things being equal.
I've installed it and OEM on Solaris and the install went quite smoothly.
An additional consideration is that 8i is eighteen months newer than 8.0,
has more capabilities and will be supported farther into the future. 8i is
clearly the direction in which Oracle is heading. From an administration
point of view, if you are comfortable with 8.0 you will be comfortable with
8i.
Van
Laurent Castellani <lcastellani_at_ilog.com> wrote in message
news:84g6q6$rmt$1_at_ffx2nh5.news.uu.net...
> We have tried Oracel 8.1.5 and we backed up to 8.0.6 The Oracle8i is a
real
> berdun for your system. It uses alot of ressources. We had to upgrade
Memory
> on our Solaris E250. There is also a few bug that are about to be resolve
on
> 8.1.6. The installation is also not really easy and requires a lot of
> memory.
>
> I would recommend to really think twice and make sure this is what you
need
> before going to Oracel8i.
>
> If you want more information please feel free to contact me.
>
> Thanks
>
> Laurent
>
> Gisele Eisenmann <geisenma_at_ilog.fr> wrote in message
> news:84ftml$31o$1_at_laposte.ilog.fr...
> >
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > Can anyone help me?
> > I am new to Oracle and I must buy for my
> > worldwide team a new server machine which will
> > host our future team database (used in a big Web application).
> >
> > Questions are:
> > What could be the correct criteria to help me selecting
> > between a NT server and a Solaris server ?
> > Does anyone have suggestions about this choice?
> >
> > And lastly, a question about Oracle 8i.
> > My company is used to work with Oracle 8.0.
> > I fancy to use Oracle 8i (because of the Java features).
> > Is it easy to move from one administration to the other?
> > Is it worth to move to Oracle 8i ?
> >
> > Thanks for any assistance.
> > Happy new year.
> > Gisele
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Thu Dec 30 1999 - 13:51:32 CST