Re: Migrating 9i to 10g performance issues
From: Sandra Becker <sbecker6925_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:08:16 -0600
Message-ID: <3c5f7820803250908te9d3b5qe8dde4c425acdd94@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:08:16 -0600
Message-ID: <3c5f7820803250908te9d3b5qe8dde4c425acdd94@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks, Mark, for the good information. I had forgotten about the
conversion aspect of transportable. No way I can do it on the source
side--can't add more disk--questionable on the target side at this point in
time. We have been running more tests on the larger tables and have found
that direct-path insert in parallel will significantly cut load time. We
will continue to test various scenarios over the next 3 weeks. There also
is some discussion of moving the largest table a month at a
time--fortunately, it now has a static date--moving the most current months
first.
Thanks everyone for all your suggestions.
Sandy
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Mar 25 2008 - 11:08:16 CDT