Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RAC 10g interconnect resilient configuration

RE: RAC 10g interconnect resilient configuration

From: Pete Sharman <peter.sharman_at_oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:21:06 +1100
Message-ID: <20060221092106954.00000001196@psharman-au>


Bryan

Hopefully you've logged those VIP failover issues as bugs. ;)

Gong back to Luca's original question, depending on your configuration NIC bonding may not be the best possible path for you. I know in some of our testing certain OS's didn't work well with NIC bonding. If you find yourself in that situation, you can always fall back on the CLUSTER_INTERCONNECTS parameter.  

Pete  

"Controlling developers is like herding cats." Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook  

"Oh no, it's not. It's much harder than that!" Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Thomas Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2006 8:06 AM
To: Luca.Canali_at_cern.ch; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: RE: RAC 10g interconnect resilient configuration

Luca,

I would highly recommend anyone setting up RAC to using bonding for the interconnect.

We have seen problems with the VIP not failing over properly in certain circumstances.

Dell has a good document that describes the NIC bonding located here:

http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/software/appora10/linEM64T/en/index.ht m

Bryan Thomas

Senior Performance Consultant
Performance Tuning Corp.
http://www.perftuning.com
Email: bthomas_at_perftuning.com

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Luca Canali
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 2:53 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RAC 10g interconnect resilient configuration

Hi,

I am trying to find a good HA configuration for the interconnect network of RAC on Linux (10gR2 on RHEL 3). I have redundant switches and NICs for the interconnect. From my tests and from Oracle documentation I see that RAC can handle network (switch) failures, by simply bypassing the failed network, while unfortunately 10gR2 clusterware can only be configured to use 1 network (if that fails all RAC nodes but one go down).
From metalink Note:220970.1 I found a reference to using NIC bonding (unfortunately the link to the doc is broken, which is not a good start for an HA doc).
I wonder whether implementing bonding is a good idea for the RAC interconnect, besides the extra complexity, I am afraid of loosing scalability regarding RAC (cache fusion) being able to load balance over the NICs (as it does in the 'normal' configuration).

Any thoughts/ experiences to share on this?

Thanks,
L.



Luca Canali
Information Technology Department
CERN - European Organization for Nuclear Research Geneva, Switzerland
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Mon Feb 20 2006 - 16:21:06 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US